FONTE: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/08/09/mala-a09.html
Qualche idea di base di questo articolo:
" Dato lo stretto controllo cui sono sottoposti i media malesi, sembra che l'accusa a Kiev di aver abbattuto l'aereo MH17 abbia l'imprimatur dello Stato Malese...
Gli Stati Uniti e i media europei hanno... sostenuto che il presidente russo Vladimir Putin è stato responsabile della distruzione dell' MH17, senza presentare alcuna prova a sostegno di questa accusa...
(invece ormai pare probabile che)... il volo Malaysia MH17 è stato abbattuto da un missile aria-aria e che ciò è stato voluto dal governo ucraino.
Il New Straits Times ha citato diverse fonti a sostegno della sua posizione.
Una fonte è la testimonianza basata su immagini monitor del canadese-ucraino Michael Bociurkiw ( OSCE), uno dei primi investigatori arrivato sul luogo dello schianto. Parlando alla Canadian Broadcasting Corporation il 29 luglio, Bociurkiw ha detto: "Ci sono stati due o tre pezzi di fusoliera che sono stati veramente trivellati con quelli che sembrano essere quasi proiettili di mitragliatrice. Un fuoco di mitragliatrice molto, molto forte."
Un'altra fonte è un articolo dall'ex giornalista di Associated Press Robert Parry, che ora scrive per il sito web ConsortiumNews.com. Data la mancanza di prove a sostegno della tesi statunitense Parry ha detto, "alcuni analisti dell' intelligence statunitensi hanno concluso che i ribelli e la Russia probabilmente non hanno colpa, e che sembra che la responsabilità sia delle forze governative ucraine".
Perry è del parere che le affermazioni del segretario di Stato Usa John Kerry, secondo il quale le forze filo-russe hanno abbattuto l'aereo, sono bugie.
"Solo tre giorni dopo l'incidente, il Segretario di Stato Kerry ha fatto il giro dei talk show "dimostrando" che ad agire sono stati i ribelli, con missili forniti dalla Russia...ma ..l'intelligence USA manca di immagini satellitari a sostegno delle accuse di Kerry e l'unico sistema missilistico Buk in quella parte di Ucraina sembrava essere sotto il controllo dei militari ucraini."
Infine, sia il New Straits Times che Parry citano il pilota della Lufthansa Peter Haisenko (in pensione), che ha fatto notare che le prove fotografiche del relitto mostrano che i pannelli della cabina di guida sono stati colpiti con mitragliatrice e fuoco pesante ... sia sul lato sinistro che sul lato destro. Questo esclude ogni missile sparato da terra ", ha scritto Parry.
Il rapporto del New Straits Times costituisce una potente accusa non solo contro il governo ucraino, ma contro Washington, Berlino, ed i loro alleati europei: hanno installato il regime di Kiev attraverso un colpo di stato fascista guidato nel mese di febbraio. Hanno poi schierato una serie di agenti dei servizi segreti e mercenari della Blackwater (il coordinamento delle varie milizie fasciste e le unità della Guardia nazionale in lotta per Kiev a terra nella zona est dell' Ucraina, dove l'MH17 è stato abbattuto).
Queste forze ora sono accusate ... di alimentare un confronto politico e militare esplosivo con la Russia sul suo confine con l'Ucraina che minaccia di sfociare in una guerra nucleare...
Questa presa di posizione dalla Malaysia è tanto più significativa, in quanto la Malesia non è un avversario strategico degli Stati Uniti, a differenza della Russia,
Il New Straits Times e le sue fonti si stanno basando su parti dell' intelligence degli Stati Uniti che, scontente dalla totale mancanza di prove a sostegno delle accuse americane contro Putin e temendo una catastrofica escalation militare, hanno criticato la gestione di Washington della crisi.
Inoltre, viene messa in risalto anche la responsabilità dei media occidentali, che hanno completamente oscurato l'indagine sullo schianto del MH17 e anche le tesi del New Straits Times. Mentre al contrario la CIA ...è stata messa in grado di... demonizzare Putin, senza che nessuna delle sue accuse fosse provata.
E per quanto riguarda i dati delle scatole nere, per esempio, l' ambasciatore ucraino in Malesia Ihor Humennyi ha detto che ...non se ne sa nulla...
Mala ysian press charges Ukraine government shot down MH 17
By Alex Lantier
9 August 2014
A Thursday article in the New Straits Times, Malaysia’s flagship English-language newspaper, charged the US- and European-backed Ukrainian regime in Kiev with shooting down Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 in east Ukraine last month. Given the tightly controlled character of the Malaysian media, it appears that the accusation that Kiev shot down MH17 has the imprimatur of the Malaysian state.
The US and European media have buried this remarkable report, which refutes the wave of allegations planted by the CIA in international media claiming that Russian president Vladimir Putin was responsible for the destruction of MH17, without presenting any evidence to back up this charge.
The New Straits Times article, titled “US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft,” lays out evidence that Ukrainian fighter aircraft attacked the jetliner with first a missile, then with bursts of 30-millimeter machine gun fire from both sides of MH17. The Russian army has already presented detailed radar and satellite data showing a Ukrainian Sukhoi-25 fighter jet tailing MH17 shortly before the jetliner crashed. The Kiev regime denied that its fighters were airborne in the area, however.
The New Straits Times article began, “Intelligence analysts in the United States have already concluded that Malaysia flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with it. This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air missile and finished off with cannon fire from a jet that had been shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.”
It cited “experts who had said that the photographs of the blast fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two distinct shapes—the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed with ‘flechettes,’ and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes consistent with that of cannon rounds.”
The New Straits Times cited several sources to substantiate its position. One was testimony by a Canadian-Ukrainian monitor for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Michael Bociurkiw—one of the first investigators to arrive at the crash site. Speaking to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on July 29, Bociurkiw said: “There have been two or three pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked with what almost looks like machine gun fire; very, very strong machine gun fire.”
Another source the paper cited was an article, “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts,” by former Associated Press reporter Robert Parry, who now writes for the ConsortiumNews.com web site. Given the lack of any evidence supporting US charges that pro-Russian forces shot MH17 down with a Buk anti-aircraft missile, Parry said, “some US intelligence analysts have concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault, and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame, according to a source briefed on these findings.”
Perry indicated that sections of the US intelligence apparatus have concluded that US secretary of state John Kerry’s claims that pro-Russian forces shot down the plane are lies.
“Only three days after the crash, Secretary of State Kerry did the rounds of the Sunday talk shows making what he deemed an ‘extraordinary circumstantial’ case supposedly proving that the rebels carried out the shoot-down with missiles provided by Russia. He acknowledged that the US government was ‘not drawing the final conclusion here, but there is a lot that points at the need for Russia to be responsible,’ ” Perry wrote. “By then, I was already being told that the US intelligence community lacked any satellite imagery supporting Kerry’s allegations, and that the only Buk missile system in that part of Ukraine appeared to be under the control of the Ukrainian military.”
Finally, the New Straits Times and Parry both cited retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko, who has pointed to photographic evidence of MH17 wreckage suggesting that cockpit panels were raked with heavy machine gun fire from both the port and starboard sides. “Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through the panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile,” Parry wrote.
The New Straits Times report constitutes a powerful accusation not only against the Ukrainian government, but against Washington, Berlin, and their European allies. They installed the Kiev regime through a fascist-led putsch in February. They then deployed a series of intelligence operatives and Blackwater mercenaries who are closely coordinating the various fascist militias and National Guard units fighting for Kiev on the ground in east Ukraine, where MH17 was shot down.
These forces now stand accused not only of stoking an explosive political and military confrontation with Russia on its border with Ukraine over the MH17 crash, which threatens to erupt into nuclear war, but of provoking the confrontation through the cold-blooded murder of 298 people aboard MH17.
These charges from Malaysia are all the more significant, in that Malaysia is not a strategic adversary of the United States. Unlike Russia, which already presented evidence suggesting Ukrainian involvement in the crash, Malaysia has no political motive for trying to discredit the US, the European powers, or their puppet regime in Kiev.
While it has not aligned itself as openly as the Philippines or Vietnam with the US “pivot to Asia” aimed at isolating China, Malaysia has in fact pushed for deployments of its forces in the South China Sea to contest Chinese influence in the area, in line with the agenda of the US “pivot.”
Indeed, the New Straits Times and its sources are basing themselves on sections of US intelligence that, disgruntled by the complete lack of evidence to back up US charges against Putin and fearing catastrophic military escalation, have criticized Washington’s handling of the crisis (see: “Former US intelligence personnel challenge Obama to present evidence of Russian complicity in MH17 crash”).
These events also constitute yet another indictment of the Western media, who have completely blacked out the investigation of the crash of MH17 and the latest material in the New Straits Times. Instead, the elements in the CIA and their Ukrainian proxies driving the war in east Ukraine have been able to escalate the confrontation with Russia and demonize Putin, without any of their unsubstantiated accusations of Russian involvement in the MH17 crash being challenged.
Kiev regime officials are continuing to stonewall the investigation, refusing Malaysian requests for information about MH17, such as the record of communication between the doomed plane and air traffic controllers in Kiev.
In an interview with the New Straits Times, Ukrainian ambassador to Malaysia Ihor Humennyi denied reports that the tapes had been seized by Ukraine’s State Security Service (SBU). “There is no proof or evidence that the tapes were confiscated by the SBU. I only read this in the newspapers,” he said.
When the New Straits Times asked where the tapes were, Humennyi said he did not know. “We don’t have any information that it had not been given to the investigation team, or that it was not received by the [team of international] investigators,” he said.